Again, you desacredited yourself everytime you write a post. This is not a neutral view of young men: it is a lefty propaganda panfleto you use to help not men, but democrats.
You are NOT concerned about young men: you are concerned about Democrats. A pitty: a lot of people trusted you.
If, in your mind, someone can both support men and Democrats, my comment was not for you either.
And no, after making a civil war on men for 40 years, Democrats have no moral authority to speak for men.
And, as I am a man and you seems not to be, dont womensplaining me about mens issues: Reeves is not supporting men. His is supporting Democrats to gain track with men, which is not the same.
You know it's interesting, because I agree with this, especially the part about Dems assuming quick wins, but it is also true that their current outreach is sad. I only knew about the DNC blueprint from an online article.
Again, you desacredited yourself everytime you write a post. This is not a neutral view of young men: it is a lefty propaganda panfleto you use to help not men, but democrats.
You are NOT concerned about young men: you are concerned about Democrats. A pitty: a lot of people trusted you.
If, in your mind, someone can either support men or Democrats, you are not persuadable and this kind of content is not for you.
If, in your mind, someone can both support men and Democrats, my comment was not for you either.
And no, after making a civil war on men for 40 years, Democrats have no moral authority to speak for men.
And, as I am a man and you seems not to be, dont womensplaining me about mens issues: Reeves is not supporting men. His is supporting Democrats to gain track with men, which is not the same.
You know it's interesting, because I agree with this, especially the part about Dems assuming quick wins, but it is also true that their current outreach is sad. I only knew about the DNC blueprint from an online article.